BISHOPS OF OXFORD

 Back
  Next

Samuel Wilberforce: Bishop of Oxford 1845–1869


Bishop Wilberforce

VANITY FAIR.
LONDON, JULY 24, 1869
STATESMEN.—No. XXV.
THE BISHOP OF OXFORD
:

Not a brawler”

”The Church has always claimed and received in the person of its dignitaries what laymen think an unfair proportion of sympathy and affection from society and the ladies, and the envious are often apt to complain of the influence exercised in all countries by the mysterious attributes of the clergy in making life disproportionately smooth and easy for them. The Bishop of Oxford, however, would be allowed by the most envious to have fairly won by personal qualities which are not only distinct from his cloth, but, as some men pretend to think, inconsistent with it, the great popularity of which he is the object. It is not for nothing that he is descended from the philanthropic Wilberforce, for he shows in all he does and says that he loves his fellow men and women in a much more attractive and less impracticable way than is usual among bishops. He is, of course, from the nature of his office, not a brawler, but he goes beyond this, and is an adept in the graceful social arts which are even more efficacious than sermons in making life pleasant; so that if the English Church was disestablished tomorrow he assuredly would be provided for by a grateful country as the most amusing diner out of his time.—JEHU JUNIOR.”

Samuel Wilberforce (1805–1873) was the son of William Wilberforce, the MP who led the anti-slave-trade movement. Samuel was Bishop of Oxford from 1845 to 1869, and was known as “Soapy Sam”. He was then Bishop of Winchester from 1869 until July 1873, when he was thrown from his horse on the Surrey downs and died instantly.

Standing with crook

Samuel Wilberforce and his dog

Wilberforce

Photograph of Wilberforce

 

Wilberforce at desk

 

Margaret Dyne Jeune wrote in her diary on 5 May 1861 that the Bishop of Oxford had preached in the afternoon on the Martyrdom of Stephen:

“The picture of the scene of murder was striking, but delivered in his Lordship’s usual mouthing style and the change of tone was exaggerated and affected, and moreover he expressed feeling quite beyond the requirements of his words, which has always a bad effect.”

 

 

 

 

 

Oxford History Home

©Stephanie Jenkins

Oxford Bishops Home